5.5 MERIS and MODIS (preparing the images) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geogrophical grids Extracting the study area Chlorophyll concentrations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References:
Images: MER_RR_1COLRA 20030424~.N1 Description
Download image
|
In this section you will be comparing the MERIS composite you created earler with an 8-day composite from MODIS to see how data from from different sensors may vary. You will also be exploring reasons for these differences. Note: This section uses the 8-day composite, mer_200402_8day.dat, which you created in the last section.You will start by processing the MODIS composite to compare to the earlier MERIS image. Open the file l5_mod_a20040332004040.l3m_8d_chlo_4.hdf accepting the default stretches. This is an 8-day composite taken over approximately the same time period as the MERIS file. The HDF file contains metadata that you will need later to process the image. Activity: Open the Scientific Global Attributes and use this information to answer the questions below, making a note of the answers.
Converting to a geographical gridThe [x,y] coordinates of an image allow you to identify and find specific pixels in a particular image. However, a more universal coordinate system allows the comparison of pixels in different images, even if these vary in resolution or area covered. It also allows you to compare satellite data with measurements made from ships and buoys. Although the image uses a Lat/Lon grid the software does not yet have the necessary information to display these geographical coordinates. To change the display from [x,y] to [lon,lat] you need the following information from question 1:
Activity: Activate the MODIS image by clicking on it. Use the information from Question 1 to change the image coordinates to [lon,lat]:
Move your cursor around the image, using either the arrow keys or your mouse. Observe how the status bar now shows the pixel position in degrees (°), minutes (') and seconds ("), using W or E for longitude, and N or S for latitude To check that you have set the coordinates correctly scroll to the bottom right corner of the image. (You may want to zoom out first, to speed this up: Right-click inside the image frame, select Zoom from the drop-down menu, and click Preserve shape on the Zoom dialogue.) The image covers the whole Earth, so the bottom right corner coordinates shown on the status bar should be very close to 180°E 90°S. Save the file as: modis_8day.dat
Repeat this for the MERIS composite, selecting the pixel size you resampled the image to in the last section and the coordinates of the study area for the latitude and longitude.
Save the image.
You now need to extract the study area from the MODIS global image. To do this:
Save this file as MODIS_l3m_8d_extract.dat.
Open your MERIS composite, setting the stretch to logarithmic, the null value to zero and the upper data value to 4 and have a look at the two files.
You should be able to instantly see the similarities and pick out the same features in each image. However the images are not yet comparable. Although they cover the same geographical area the pixel sizes are different.
Have a look at your answers to question one and the information from the last section of the tutorial.
a)
When you resampled the MODIS image you did not end up with exact degrees (the image is slightly smaller) than our sample area. Why do you think this is?
b)
What are the pixel sizes of the MERIS and MODIS images?
c)
How much larger are the MODIS pixels? And what does this represent?
d)
What would be the most sensible pixel size to choose to resample to?
You are going to resample the MERIS image to set the correct pixel size and grid.
We could just resample the image, however bilko´s resampling algorithms simply sub sample the image to create the new pixel size (they pick one pixel value and use it´s value for the new size) rather than averaging the data. This gives a 'spiky' image and results in less accurate data. To correct this issue you will need to average the data to match the pixel size of the MODIS image as closely as possible, in order to do this we need to use a mean filter on the MERIS image.
Select the image and from the image menu select filter » mean to apply a mean filter. Select an average size of three by three pixels and run the filter.
Save the file as mer_200402_8day_fm33.dat.
We now need to resample our averaged image to exactly the same pixel size and grid as the MODIS image to allow further comparison.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Answers: |
Converting to chlorophyll concentrationsThe images are now the same size and are mapped to the same grid, however before we can compare our two images we still need to convert the data in the MODIS image into chlorophyll concentrations. We will need to know the null value of the data to do this, examine the areas of the image over land and cloud to find this out. To convert the data we will use a formula document, modis_convert_algal.fm, open the file and take a minute to look at it.
The new image should look very similar to the old one but, when you browse around the new image, the data should be on a similar scale to your MERIS image. Save the image as modis_8day_chla.dat. Close the stack and all other images. We now have two comparable images. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|